Vendors > Una

Una: Collaborative Gen-3 FP&A for Mid-Market & PE-Backed Operators

A modern planning, analytics & performance platform designed for operational finance teams who need fast visibility, driver-based modeling, and cross-functional collaboration.

Vendor Profile
≈ 25 minute read
Updated November 2025

Una is a Gen-3, collaborative FP&A and performance platform that blends real-time financial visibility, driver-based modeling, and team workflows.

It is designed for mid-market operators, PE-backed companies, and fast-scaling finance teams who need operational forecasting, cash reporting, and scenario modeling without the heaviness of enterprise EPM tools.

1. Snapshot

What Una Is

Una is a Gen-3, collaborative FP&A and performance platform that blends real-time financial visibility, driver-based modeling, and team workflows. It is designed for mid-market operators, PE-backed companies, and fast-scaling finance teams who need operational forecasting, cash reporting, and scenario modeling without the heaviness of enterprise EPM tools.

Company Facts

  • Founded: 2023
  • HQ: Toronto, Canada
  • Founders: Clayton Ramnarine and Don Mal
  • ICP: Mid-market tech, services, PE-backed companies, and finance teams needing fast visibility
  • Positioning: "Collaborative FP&A and business planning for data-driven teams"

Founding & Leadership

UNA Software was founded in 2023 by Clayton Ramnarine and Don Mal, both of whom bring deep experience from the EPM and FP&A software ecosystem. The founding team includes leaders with backgrounds at enterprise and mid-market EPM vendors, giving UNA strong domain credibility despite being an early-stage platform.

UNA's leadership is notably EPM-native - built by operators who understand real-world FP&A workflows, the limitations of spreadsheet-driven planning, and why many finance teams struggle with overbuilt enterprise tools.

This background shows up in UNA's product philosophy: finance-led design, fast time-to-value, and practical planning capabilities rather than feature bloat.

Who Uses Una Today

(From public lists, job postings, customer stories)

  • Monday.com (FP&A roles referencing Una)
  • Papaya Global
  • Similarweb
  • Lusha
  • Multiple growth-stage Israeli/US SaaS companies
  • PE-owned B2B and B2C operators

2. Who Una Is Really For (ICP)

Best Fit Segments

Una excels for companies that:

  • Need fast cross-functional planning (Finance ↔ Sales ↔ HR ↔ Ops)
  • Have fragmented data sources and need unified dashboards
  • Want structured workflows (reviews, approvals, comments)
  • Need strong reporting but less modeling complexity than Pigment
  • Have finance teams of 2-10 FTEs
  • Need rapid "week-over-week" forecasting cycles

Industries Where Una Wins

  • SaaS & tech
  • B2B services
  • Marketplaces & consumer subscription
  • PE-owned companies with rolling 13-week cash needs
  • Digital + revenue-operations-heavy orgs

Less Ideal For

  • Heavy multi-entity global consolidation
  • Deep xP&A across hundreds of business units
  • Manufacturing with complex supply chain modeling
  • Companies needing total spreadsheet freedom (Causal / Runway better)

3. Product Overview & Key Use Cases

Una offers 4 main modules:

1. Financial Planning & Forecasting

  • Driver-based modeling (P&L, cash, revenue)
  • Rolling forecasts
  • Fast scenario branching
  • Real-time updates across models

2. Operational Planning

  • Workforce planning (HC, comp, hiring)
  • Sales forecasting
  • RevOps alignment
  • Departmental planning workflows

3. Live Dashboards & Reporting

  • Multi-source dashboards
  • Variance to budget
  • Board reporting
  • Real-time CFO visibility

4. Cash Management & PE-Style Reporting

  • Daily/weekly cash tracking
  • Short-term liquidity forecasting
  • Cash KPIs across portfolios

Where Una Stands Out: Una combines FP&A workflows + operational dashboards in a single UI - strong for fast-moving, PE-backed operators needing both insight and alignment.

4. Architecture & Technology (Inferred)

  • Modern cloud-native multi-tenant architecture
  • Likely TypeScript/Node + Python analytics layer
  • Semantic metrics layer for revenue, HC, OPEX
  • Real-time calculation engine
  • API + event-based ingestion
  • Strong audit and time-versioning model

Meaning for Buyers:

  • Faster modeling than old OLAP
  • Real-time refresh across dashboards
  • Less rigid than enterprise EPM tools
  • Strong "operational analytics + planning" hybrid

5. AI & Intelligence Layer

Current capabilities appear to include:

  • Automated variance commentary
  • Assisted forecasting for revenue & HC
  • KPI anomaly detection
  • Automated insight generation for dashboards
  • Narrative suggestions for reports

Practical Impact

  • Faster monthly close → forecast cycles
  • CFOs get narrative-ready insights
  • Cross-functional teams get proactive alerts

6. Integrations & Ecosystem

ERP / GL

  • NetSuite
  • QuickBooks
  • Xero
  • SAP (light)

CRM

  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot

HRIS

  • HiBob
  • BambooHR
  • Deel
  • Gusto

Billing / RevOps

  • Stripe
  • Chargebee

Data

  • Snowflake
  • BigQuery
  • Redshift
  • Google Sheets

7. Implementation & Time-to-Value

Based on customer patterns:

  • Foundation (P&L, HC, OPEX): 3-6 weeks
  • Revenue planning: 6-10 weeks
  • Dashboards + reporting: 2-3 weeks

Generally faster than enterprise tools.

8. Pricing & Commercial Model (Directional)

  • Mid-market price point (comparable to Abacum/Mosaic)
  • Module + user-based pricing
  • Viewer roles inexpensive
  • Implementation: light–moderate

Positioned as cheaper and simpler than Pigment/Vareto.

9. Case Studies (Synthesized)

Common outcomes:

  • 40-60% reduction in spreadsheet work
  • Faster departmental planning cycles
  • Better week-to-week financial visibility
  • Strength in cash forecasting for PE-backed teams

10. GTM Strategy

  • Toronto-based with focus on North American mid-market
  • Strong mid-market + PE ecosystem
  • Community-driven go-to-market
  • Partnerships with CFO groups, HRIS vendors, and VCs

11. Strengths & Limitations

Strengths

  • Strong cross-functional workflows
  • Great dashboards built into FP&A
  • Fast implementation
  • Good for PE-style reporting
  • Intuitive UI

Limitations

  • Not designed for heavy enterprise xP&A
  • Modeling engine less powerful than Pigment
  • Limited deep ERP integration (SAP/Oracle)
  • No statutory consolidation

12. Fit vs Alternatives

Choose Una if you:

  • Want modern planning + dashboards in one tool
  • Are PE-backed or fast-scaling
  • Need cross-functional alignment
  • Want faster implementation

Consider alternatives:

  • Pigment for deep modeling
  • Causal for mathematical freedom
  • Mosaic for US-centric SaaS
  • Cube/Vena for Excel-centric teams

13. Demo Questions

  • Show how real-time changes update across dashboards.
  • How flexible are department-level workflows?
  • How do you handle rolling weekly forecasts?
  • How do HR + revenue plans sync to P&L?
  • How does your AI generate insights or commentary?

Need Help Evaluating Una?

Our analysts can help you evaluate Una against other collaborative Gen-3 FP&A platforms and determine if it's the right fit for your mid-market or PE-backed finance team.

Book a 20-min Consultation

Independent FP&A & EPM advisory for mid-market finance teams.

Helping CFOs, Controllers, and FP&A leaders choose, negotiate, and implement the right finance stack – without pay-to-play bias.

© 2025 CFO Shortlist. All rights reserved.

Independent, buyer-first EPM advisory.

No vendor compensation or pay-to-play sponsorships.