EPM 101Cloud vs On-Premise
EPM 101

Cloud vs On-Premise EPM: Comparing Deployment Models for Finance Teams

How to evaluate cloud, on-premise and hybrid deployment models — and why the market has decisively shifted toward cloud-first EPM.

EPM 101 Guide10 min readUpdated February 2026

The EPM market has shifted decisively toward cloud. Most new implementations are cloud-based, and legacy on-premise vendors are actively migrating their customer bases. But the decision between cloud and on-premise is not purely technical — it affects cost structure, upgrade cadence, security posture, customization flexibility and long-term vendor dependency.

This guide covers how cloud and on-premise EPM differ, the implications for finance teams, when on-premise still makes sense, what hybrid looks like and how to evaluate deployment models during vendor selection.

The Market Shift to Cloud

A decade ago, most EPM deployments were on-premise. Organizations purchased licenses, provisioned servers and managed upgrades internally. Today, the vast majority of new EPM implementations are cloud-based, and the reasons are straightforward: faster deployment, lower upfront cost, automatic upgrades and reduced IT burden.

Oracle has end-of-lifed Hyperion. SAP is transitioning BPC to SAP Analytics Cloud. OneStream and Anaplan are cloud-native. Planful, Pigment, Vena and Workday Adaptive are all cloud-only. The direction is clear.

For most organizations evaluating EPM today, the question is not whether to go cloud, but which cloud platform fits best.

Cloud vs On-Premise: Key Differences

DIMENSIONCLOUDON-PREMISE
DeploymentVendor-hosted, accessible via browserSelf-hosted on company servers
Upfront costLow — subscription modelHigh — license + infrastructure
Ongoing costPredictable annual subscriptionMaintenance + IT staff + upgrades
UpgradesAutomatic, vendor-managedManual, project-based, often deferred
CustomizationConfiguration within platform limitsDeep customization possible
Time to deploy3-6 months typical6-18 months typical
ScalabilityElastic — scales with demandFixed — requires capacity planning
SecurityVendor-managed SOC 2, encryptionSelf-managed, full control

When On-Premise Still Makes Sense

On-premise is increasingly rare for new deployments, but some organizations have legitimate reasons to stay:

Strict data residency or sovereignty requirements

Highly regulated industries with on-premise mandates

Deep customizations that cloud platforms cannot replicate

Large existing investment in on-premise infrastructure

Air-gapped environments with no external connectivity

Even in these cases, hybrid models — cloud EPM with on-premise data storage — are increasingly viable.

What Finance Teams Should Care About

For FP&A and accounting teams, the deployment model affects daily experience in several ways.

Upgrade cadence

Cloud platforms release updates quarterly or continuously. On-premise upgrades are major projects. Cloud means you always have the latest features. On-premise means you may be years behind.

Performance and availability

Cloud vendors manage uptime SLAs, typically 99.5-99.9%. On-premise performance depends on your infrastructure team and capacity planning.

Integration flexibility

Cloud platforms offer APIs and pre-built connectors. On-premise may require middleware or custom development for integration.

Vendor lock-in

Cloud subscriptions create ongoing dependency. On-premise licenses give more control but vendor support eventually ends, forcing migration anyway.

Frequently Asked Questions

Continue Reading

Evaluating EPM deployment options?

Book a free consultation for vendor-neutral guidance on cloud, on-premise and hybrid deployment models.

Independent FP&A & EPM advisory for mid-market finance teams.

Helping CFOs, Controllers, and FP&A leaders choose, negotiate, and implement the right finance stack – without pay-to-play bias.

© 2026 CFO Shortlist. All rights reserved.

Independent, buyer-first EPM advisory.

No vendor compensation or pay-to-play sponsorships.