Pigment vs Planful: Complete Comparison for Modern FP&A Teams
Which FP&A platform delivers better modelling, usability, integrations, and ROI?
Executive Summary
Pigment and Planful are two of the highest-momentum FP&A platforms in the mid-market and upper-mid-market today. Both are cloud-native, both are modern alternatives to legacy EPM systems, and both deliver rapid time-to-value for finance teams.
But they represent two different philosophies:
Planful is an FP&A platform designed for speed, usability, reporting, and finance-led planning.
Pigment is a business-wide planning platform built for complex modelling, multi-function scenarios, and cross-department planning.
CFO Shortlist Verdict
Choose Planful if you want the fastest time-to-value, finance-friendly administration, strong reporting, and a tool every budget owner can use without training.
Choose Pigment if you want a more powerful modelling engine, deeper scenarios, cross-functional planning (Finance + RevOps + People), and an AI-enhanced environment built for scale.
For typical mid-market FP&A teams, Planful will be the faster and simpler choice. For fast-growing or upper-mid-market companies, Pigment provides the flexibility and power needed to scale.
Quick Comparison Table
Vendor Overview
Pigment
Pigment is a modern, scalable planning platform designed to unify finance + HR + RevOps + operations into one modelling environment. It excels at multi-dimensional modelling, scenario planning, and board-level visualizations. It's flexible enough to support finance-heavy use cases while also enabling department-specific planning.
Pigment is best for:
- Multi-entity, multi-department companies
- Finance teams that want deep modelling & rich scenarios
- Organizations replacing Excel + legacy EPM
- Teams wanting FP&A + RevOps + HR in one place
- Companies scaling from 200 → 5,000 employees
Planful
Planful is a mid-market-focused FP&A platform with a reputation for fast deployment, excellent usability, and strong financial reporting. It's designed primarily for finance teams that want a best-in-class FP&A system without the complexity of an enterprise EPM.
Planful is best for:
- Mid-market finance teams (100–5,000 employees)
- Companies upgrading from Excel-based budgeting
- Organizations wanting simplicity + speed
- CFOs who care about reporting and adoption
- FP&A wanting to own the system without IT
Architecture & Modelling Engine
Pigment – "Modelling powerhouse"
Pigment's modelling engine is built for:
- Multi-dimensional hierarchies
- Rich scenario branching
- Real-time recalculation
- Shared metrics across FP&A, HR, and GTM
- Flexible logic that can represent nearly any model structure
Pigment feels closer to a true modelling canvas — almost like a structured version of Excel + an EPM system.
Planful – "Finance-first planning"
Planful's modelling structure emphasizes:
- Faster, simpler model setup
- Finance-led ownership
- Structured templates for P&L, OpEx, HC, CapEx
- Logic that is intuitive for FP&A analysts
- Guardrails that prevent complexity from spiraling
It's not as open-ended as Pigment, but that's a benefit for mid-market companies that don't need complicated architectures.
Planning, Forecasting & Scenario Modelling
Where Pigment shines
- Best-in-class scenario modelling
- Multi-scenario simulation with sliders, toggles, and dynamic filters
- "What if headcount drops 10%?" recalculates instantly
- Very strong for revenue modelling, capacity models, GTM planning
- Easy to connect Finance + RevOps + People in a single model
Pigment's scenario engine is elite — one of the best in FP&A software.
Where Planful shines
- Rolling forecasts that finance can update without breaking the model
- Very strong OpEx planning and department budgeting
- Excellent financial statements (P&L, BS, CF)
- Perfect for simple-to-moderate scenario modeling
- Best for finance-led planning rather than company-wide planning
Planful wins for pure FP&A workflows.
UX, Adoption & Business User Experience
Pigment
- Modern, slick UI
- "Boards" combine tables, charts, KPIs, and filters beautifully
- Excellent for RevOps + HR collaboration
- Non-finance users actually enjoy using it
- Slightly steeper admin learning curve
Pigment wins for cross-functional adoption.
Planful
- Very easy for business users
- Familiar, spreadsheet-friendly UI
- Reporting looks like something a CFO would present on day 1
- Department managers adopt quickly — minimal training
Planful wins for finance adoption and simplicity.
Integrations & Data Strategy
Pigment
- Strong API + modern data-stack alignment
- Great fit for Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift
- Good ERP, CRM, HRIS connections
- Built for cross-functional data syncs
- Works well when a company already has a warehouse
Pigment = best if your company is "data-modern".
Planful
- Very strong mid-market integrations (NetSuite, Sage Intacct, MS Dynamics)
- Easy CRM integrations (Salesforce)
- Great for companies without advanced data infrastructure
- FP&A can own integrations without IT
Planful = best for typical mid-market ERP environments.
Implementation Speed & Effort
Pigment
- Typical timeline: 6–10 weeks
- Faster for FP&A-only implementations
- More involved if modeling multiple functions
- Requires a "model owner" role
Planful
- Typical timeline: 6–12 weeks
- Less modelling complexity = fewer risks
- FP&A can take over quickly
- Very light admin overhead
AI, Automation & Roadmap
Pigment
Pigment is one of the leaders in AI for FP&A:
- Agentic AI for proactive insights
- AI-generated scenarios
- AI-assisted modelling
- Conversational analysis
Roadmap velocity: very high.
Planful
Planful focuses on practical FP&A AI, such as:
- Variance explanations
- Forecast suggestions
- Anomaly detection
- Automated workflows
Roadmap velocity: solid, finance-focused.
Pricing & Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
Pigment
- License tier: $$–$$$
- TCO tied to breadth of deployment (Finance vs Finance + HR + GTM)
- Higher upside if you adopt it company-wide
Planful
- License tier: $$–$$$
- Lower services cost
- Lower admin cost
- Very predictable 3-year TCO
Ideal Customer Fit
Choose Pigment if you:
- Need flexible, multi-dimensional modelling
- Want cross-functional planning across Finance, RevOps, and HR
- Have dynamic headcount, revenue, and scenario workflows
- Want a future-proof, AI-driven planning platform
- Are scaling quickly (200 → 5,000 employees)
- Have or want a modern data stack
Choose Planful if you:
- Need fast time-to-value with minimal admin
- Want strong reporting and clean budgeting workflows
- Are primarily FP&A-led in planning
- Don't need enterprise-level modelling complexity
- Have typical mid-market ERPs (NetSuite, Intacct, BC)
- Want predictable TCO and simpler governance
CFO Shortlist Final Verdict
Pigment and Planful are both excellent FP&A tools — but optimized for different levels of planning maturity.
Planful is the best fit for traditional FP&A teams that want speed, usability, and strong reporting with minimal complexity.
Pigment is ideal for high-growth or upper-mid-market companies that want deeper modelling, scenario planning, and cross-functional planning in one platform.
You want a reliable, fast-to-deploy platform that FP&A can fully own. Speed, simplicity, and strong reporting are top priorities.
Your FP&A needs are rapidly evolving or you plan to centralize finance, HR, and RevOps into one planning layer. You need deeper modelling and cross-functional planning.
Next Reports
Continue exploring FP&A platform comparisons
FAQs
Which platform is better for mid-market FP&A teams?
For typical mid-market FP&A teams, Planful will be the faster and simpler choice with excellent reporting, finance-friendly administration, and fast time-to-value. For fast-growing or upper-mid-market companies that need deeper modelling, scenario planning, and cross-functional planning (Finance + RevOps + HR), Pigment provides the flexibility and power needed to scale.
How do Pigment and Planful differ on scenario planning?
Pigment offers best-in-class scenario modelling with multi-scenario simulation, instant recalculation, sliders, toggles, and dynamic filters—making it elite for 'what-if' analysis. Planful has strong scenario modelling capabilities that work excellently for most mid-market use cases, focusing on finance-led rolling forecasts and department budgeting rather than complex multi-dimensional scenarios.
Which platform has better cross-functional planning capabilities?
Pigment excels at cross-functional planning, easily connecting Finance, RevOps, and HR in a single model with shared metrics and unified planning workflows. Planful is designed primarily as a finance-first platform, though it can support other departments. Choose Pigment if you want company-wide planning; choose Planful if finance-led planning is your priority.
Sources
- Pigment product documentation, AI features, and 2025 roadmap announcements.
- Planful product pages, AI features, and 2025 roadmap briefings.
- CFO Shortlist FP&A benchmark data (2024–2025).
- Vendor demos, customer reference interviews, and independent reviews.
Need Personalized EPM Guidance?
Get expert help choosing the right EPM solution for your organization
Book a 20-min Consultation