Pigment vs Planful: Complete Comparison for Modern FP&A Teams
Which FP&A platform delivers better modelling, usability, integrations, and ROI?
Executive Summary
Pigment and Planful are two of the highest-momentum FP&A platforms in the mid-market and upper-mid-market today. Both are cloud-native, both are modern alternatives to legacy EPM systems, and both deliver rapid time-to-value for finance teams.
But they represent two different philosophies:
Planful is an FP&A platform designed for speed, usability, reporting, and finance-led planning.
Pigment is a business-wide planning platform built for complex modelling, multi-function scenarios, and cross-department planning.
CFO Shortlist Verdict
Choose Planful if you want the fastest time-to-value, finance-friendly administration, strong reporting, and a tool every budget owner can use without training.
Choose Pigment if you want a more powerful modelling engine, deeper scenarios, cross-functional planning (Finance + RevOps + People), and an AI-enhanced environment built for scale.
For typical mid-market FP&A teams, Planful will be the faster and simpler choice. For fast-growing or upper-mid-market companies, Pigment provides the flexibility and power needed to scale.
Quick Comparison Table
Vendor Overview
Pigment
Pigment is a modern, scalable planning platform designed to unify finance + HR + RevOps + operations into one modelling environment. It excels at multi-dimensional modelling, scenario planning, and board-level visualizations. It's flexible enough to support finance-heavy use cases while also enabling department-specific planning.
Pigment is best for:
- Multi-entity, multi-department companies
- Finance teams that want deep modelling & rich scenarios
- Organizations replacing Excel + legacy EPM
- Teams wanting FP&A + RevOps + HR in one place
- Companies scaling from 200 → 5,000 employees
Planful
Planful is a mid-market-focused FP&A platform with a reputation for fast deployment, excellent usability, and strong financial reporting. It's designed primarily for finance teams that want a best-in-class FP&A system without the complexity of an enterprise EPM.
Planful is best for:
- Mid-market finance teams (100–5,000 employees)
- Companies upgrading from Excel-based budgeting
- Organizations wanting simplicity + speed
- CFOs who care about reporting and adoption
- FP&A wanting to own the system without IT
Architecture & Modelling Engine
Pigment – "Modelling powerhouse"
Pigment's modelling engine is built for:
- Multi-dimensional hierarchies
- Rich scenario branching
- Real-time recalculation
- Shared metrics across FP&A, HR, and GTM
- Flexible logic that can represent nearly any model structure
Pigment feels closer to a true modelling canvas — almost like a structured version of Excel + an EPM system.
Planful – "Finance-first planning"
Planful's modelling structure emphasizes:
- Faster, simpler model setup
- Finance-led ownership
- Structured templates for P&L, OpEx, HC, CapEx
- Logic that is intuitive for FP&A analysts
- Guardrails that prevent complexity from spiraling
It's not as open-ended as Pigment, but that's a benefit for mid-market companies that don't need complicated architectures.
Planning, Forecasting & Scenario Modelling
Where Pigment shines
- Best-in-class scenario modelling
- Multi-scenario simulation with sliders, toggles, and dynamic filters
- "What if headcount drops 10%?" recalculates instantly
- Very strong for revenue modelling, capacity models, GTM planning
- Easy to connect Finance + RevOps + People in a single model
Pigment's scenario engine is elite — one of the best in FP&A software.
Where Planful shines
- Rolling forecasts that finance can update without breaking the model
- Very strong OpEx planning and department budgeting
- Excellent financial statements (P&L, BS, CF)
- Perfect for simple-to-moderate scenario modeling
- Best for finance-led planning rather than company-wide planning
Planful wins for pure FP&A workflows.
UX, Adoption & Business User Experience
Pigment
- Modern, slick UI
- "Boards" combine tables, charts, KPIs, and filters beautifully
- Excellent for RevOps + HR collaboration
- Non-finance users actually enjoy using it
- Slightly steeper admin learning curve
Pigment wins for cross-functional adoption.
Planful
- Very easy for business users
- Familiar, spreadsheet-friendly UI
- Reporting looks like something a CFO would present on day 1
- Department managers adopt quickly — minimal training
Planful wins for finance adoption and simplicity.
Integrations & Data Strategy
Pigment
- Strong API + modern data-stack alignment
- Great fit for Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift
- Good ERP, CRM, HRIS connections
- Built for cross-functional data syncs
- Works well when a company already has a warehouse
Pigment = best if your company is "data-modern".
Planful
- Very strong mid-market integrations (NetSuite, Sage Intacct, MS Dynamics)
- Easy CRM integrations (Salesforce)
- Great for companies without advanced data infrastructure
- FP&A can own integrations without IT
Planful = best for typical mid-market ERP environments.
Implementation Speed & Effort
Pigment
- Typical timeline: 6–10 weeks
- Faster for FP&A-only implementations
- More involved if modeling multiple functions
- Requires a "model owner" role
Planful
- Typical timeline: 6–12 weeks
- Less modelling complexity = fewer risks
- FP&A can take over quickly
- Very light admin overhead
AI, Automation & Roadmap
Pigment
Pigment is one of the leaders in AI for FP&A:
- Agentic AI for proactive insights
- AI-generated scenarios
- AI-assisted modelling
- Conversational analysis
Roadmap velocity: very high.
Planful
Planful focuses on practical FP&A AI, such as:
- Variance explanations
- Forecast suggestions
- Anomaly detection
- Automated workflows
Roadmap velocity: solid, finance-focused.
Pricing & Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
Pigment
- License tier: $$–$$$
- TCO tied to breadth of deployment (Finance vs Finance + HR + GTM)
- Higher upside if you adopt it company-wide
Planful
- License tier: $$–$$$
- Lower services cost
- Lower admin cost
- Very predictable 3-year TCO
Ideal Customer Fit
Choose Pigment if you:
- Need flexible, multi-dimensional modelling
- Want cross-functional planning across Finance, RevOps, and HR
- Have dynamic headcount, revenue, and scenario workflows
- Want a future-proof, AI-driven planning platform
- Are scaling quickly (200 → 5,000 employees)
- Have or want a modern data stack
Choose Planful if you:
- Need fast time-to-value with minimal admin
- Want strong reporting and clean budgeting workflows
- Are primarily FP&A-led in planning
- Don't need enterprise-level modelling complexity
- Have typical mid-market ERPs (NetSuite, Intacct, BC)
- Want predictable TCO and simpler governance
CFO Shortlist Final Verdict
Pigment and Planful are both excellent FP&A tools — but optimized for different levels of planning maturity.
Planful is the best fit for traditional FP&A teams that want speed, usability, and strong reporting with minimal complexity.
Pigment is ideal for high-growth or upper-mid-market companies that want deeper modelling, scenario planning, and cross-functional planning in one platform.
You want a reliable, fast-to-deploy platform that FP&A can fully own. Speed, simplicity, and strong reporting are top priorities.
Your FP&A needs are rapidly evolving or you plan to centralize finance, HR, and RevOps into one planning layer. You need deeper modelling and cross-functional planning.
Related Resources
FAQs
Which platform is better for mid-market FP&A teams?
For typical mid-market FP&A teams, Planful will be the faster and simpler choice with excellent reporting, finance-friendly administration, and fast time-to-value. For fast-growing or upper-mid-market companies that need deeper modelling, scenario planning, and cross-functional planning (Finance + RevOps + HR), Pigment provides the flexibility and power needed to scale.
How do Pigment and Planful differ on scenario planning?
Pigment offers best-in-class scenario modelling with multi-scenario simulation, instant recalculation, sliders, toggles, and dynamic filters—making it elite for 'what-if' analysis. Planful has strong scenario modelling capabilities that work excellently for most mid-market use cases, focusing on finance-led rolling forecasts and department budgeting rather than complex multi-dimensional scenarios.
Which platform has better cross-functional planning capabilities?
Pigment excels at cross-functional planning, easily connecting Finance, RevOps, and HR in a single model with shared metrics and unified planning workflows. Planful is designed primarily as a finance-first platform, though it can support other departments. Choose Pigment if you want company-wide planning; choose Planful if finance-led planning is your priority.
Sources
- Pigment product documentation, AI features, and 2025 roadmap announcements.
- Planful product pages, AI features, and 2025 roadmap briefings.
- CFO Shortlist FP&A benchmark data (2024–2025).
- Vendor demos, customer reference interviews, and independent reviews.
Need an EPM Shortlist?
Our analysts can help you narrow vendors and build ROI guardrails in under 48 hours—reach out when you're ready.